The Bernstein
Century project is a welcome development, if only because the LP
originals of so many of these releases were marred by inferior
surfaces which distracted us listeners enough to effectively mask
their considerable musical merits. It was easy to forget, back in the
late '60s, in our enthusiasm over foreign product - and especially
foreign pressings - just how wide Bernstein's grasp of the
repertoire was.
And he did nearly
everything well, if not surpassingly so. Haydn and Mozart, Nielsen,
Shostakovich and Gershwin. Yes, and Beethoven, Debussy and Mahler. We
were so caught up by Bernstein's contribution to the Mahler
revolution, it was easy to overlook his sureness of touch elsewhere.
At any rate, "Celebrating
the recorded legacy of Leonard Bernstein" (as the CD stickers
urge) is much less difficult now that we don't have to deal with the
old Columbia pressings. These three CDs, actually, derive from the
period before Columbia entered its aural grate/haze days. All
of these performances date between 1958 and 1964, and all of the
earlier recordings (the so-called "6 eye" Columbias) are
getting as hard to find as the coveted RCA "shaded dogs" and
Mercurys. As added incentive for collectors, the Beethoven Seventh
has never been previously released on CD.
Let me say first that
this Beethoven First Symphony is among the best in a very
crowded field. The recording, too, is admirably natural and well
balanced. The fierceness, which so often spoiled one's enjoyment of
'60s Columbia LPs, is nowhere evident. The Seventh Symphony is
also a fine performance, but in an even more competitive field is more
controversial in its claims on the consumer. One cannot help but
compare Bernstein with another performance by the New York
Philharmonic - the great Toscanini performance from 1936. The latter
has been called - frequently - the greatest recorded performance of
any Beethoven symphony, so that we can hardly avoid the
comparison. Bernstein, in the first three movements, does quite well.
The last movement, that movement which Wagner called "the
apotheosis of the dance", is more problematic. The way Bernstein
clips the rhythm, I cannot help but picture any ambitious closet
terpsichoreans collapsing in a tangle of limbs. More importantly, the
inexorable momentum that Toscanini and Reiner build to Dionysian
climax is vitiated by Bernstein's approach. The word "sluggish"
occurred to me on more than one occasion over several listenings. Not
the feeling one wants to get at a bacchanal.
The Debussy
performances are also better than average, particularly Jeux
which competes favourably with Boulez, Baudo, and Haitink. La Mer
lacks the Gallic nuance of Munch or the cool plushness of Karajan, and
the Faun, while predictably lush, is the least successful as a
recording. For many of us, that the Nocturnes are without the
final Sirènes will put this Debussy collection
completely out of competition.
I had never heard this
Mahler Fourth Symphony before. Let me say right off that's its
up there with the best I know, and that includes the Szell/Cleveland,
another Columbia recording from a few years later which got much more
attention in the music press. In one respect it surpasses many
otherwise excellent performances, perhaps including Szell. That is in
the choice of soprano soloist for the finale, Reri Grist. Her purity
of tone and unstudied naturalness seem to me far more persuasive than
the contributions of many more famous sopranos. The recording is
exemplary, with more clarity and immediacy than the Debussy CD.
Bernstein's Mahler Four carried me from beginning to end, with
none of that sense of episodic fragmentation that sometimes obtruded
into the consciousness during the Beethoven Seventh, or even
during La Mer. |