I am gratified to note
that Gramophone has recognized this tribute to Ealing
pictures, or more precisely to its composers, as the outstanding
soundtrack of the past year. Not too far behind in the voting was
another dip into the distant past of filmmusic, an ASV collection of
the forgotten Richard Addinsell's scores. Alwyn and his expert
orchestra were responsible for both. I suspect the success of the
former has had as much to do with a residual nostalgia for the Ealing
era as it has with the innate qualities of the music. Just the same,
in a year when Titanic was the best-selling soundtrack, I
count my blessings that any vintage work of worth is being dredged
from the sea bottom where most movie music of the golden age
languished until lately.
In the case of the
Ealing scores, a fiery metaphor is more appropriate. As so often
happened at the Hollywood studios, cost-cutting measures resulted in
the burning en masse of the original music manuscripts and audio
tracks of hundreds of the best examples of British film music. Most of
the tracks on this album had to be laboriously reconstructed from
sketches and/or audition of the film soundtrack. That this should have
been allowed to happen in England, where the traditional Hollywood
partition between concert hall and "movie music" has not
been maintained, is doubly deplorable.
So, this Ealing tribute
was a three-year project, a labor of love for producers David Wishart
and Philip Lane. I wish I could summon as much enthusiasm for the
music as for the vision. As with the preponderance of music written
for the British cinema of that era, the prevailing moods are
jocularity and stiff-upper-lip earnestness. True, the sharp shaft of
satire was the most memorable aspect of the Ealing ethos. However, the
scores written for this type of picture were severely straightened in
their stylistic and emotional options. Why were they so little noted
at the time, while their films were so celebrated? Why has there been
no drum banging for their resurrection, even among the film music
cognoscenti? I suspect the prime factor is that the emotional
constriction of most British film products of the time simply did not
lend itself to the open-hearted late romantic style that so long
dominated Hollywood products (Newman, Steiner, Korngold, Young). The
British character responds to life's adversities more often with a
raspberry than a threnody. In short, Hollywood's musicians had to
respond emotionally to their subjects, whereas those writing for the
British cinema were more likely to reflect the stoic resolve or ironic
objectivity of their films' protagonists. Thus Gary Cooper and Ronald
Colman, despite their English bloodlines, made far better subjects for
the musical muse than, say, John Mills or Michael Redgrave.
How you respond to this
stylistic contrast will determine your response to this disc. One
man's frisson is another man's wallow. Certainly, the composers
represented here were the technical equals of their Hollywood
counterparts. One impression that has long been with me, and is
confirmed by this disc: scores written for British films are often too
complex. Their composers seem verbose, show offs by comparison with
the best of Hollywood. Compare Gerard Schurmann's The Man in the
Sky with Franz Waxman's The Spirit of St. Louis. Both have
as their subjects flight. Both are ingenious. Both are superbly
orchestrated. Nevertheless, Schurmann seems fancy, merely technically
impressive, whereas Waxman is inspired. What is the difference? Well,
the quality of the respective films is one obvious factor. Waxman's
setting may be the clouds, but his music remains rooted in the earth
and heart. Similarly, John Ireland's Overlanders, his only
film work and the only music on this CD recorded before, is able but,
like Schurmann, lacking emotional resonance (since its subject is an
Australian cattle drive, Ireland may perhaps be forgiven.) So, it is
with much else that is here. Alan Rawsthorne's three selections
illustrate. The Cruel Sea has atmosphere and oh-so-Brit
resolve but also a distancing reserve. Saraband for Dead Lovers
injects too many twentieth century complexities and melodic
convolutions into its Georgian period. The Captive Heart is
the most affecting of Rawsthorne's contributions. Though perhaps a
trifle over-elaborate, its main theme has a nice ironic turn, and its
evocation of the plight of English POWs elicits the composer's
sympathy. In the midst of all this Anglo-Saxon anxiety and busy-ness,
it's a relief to find Ernest Irving's serenely simple Mozart
adaptation for Kind Hearts and Coronets. One thing you could
count on with the Hollywood boys - Rozsa (sometimes) and Tiomkin (most
of the time) excepted - they did not overwrite their subjects. Even
though Copland, Bernstein and Irving Bazelon could be counted on to
chastise them for bringing a Strauss-size orchestra into every living
room or back alley, the Hollywood crew knew from experience that less
is more if you want to involve the viewer. When it came to wringing
our hearts or riveting our eyes, Max Steiner could do more with a
single suspended chord (yes, in the entire orchestra!) than all
the excerpts on this CD together accomplish. (Check out the end of
the Gable/DeHavilland window scene in Gone With the Wind, or
the plane hanger showdown in Casablanca.)
In this sober company,
Frenchman George Auric profits by contrast, for his Gallic bounce
found suitable outlet in romps like The Lavendar Hill Mob,
Passport to Pimlico and The Titfield Thunderbolt. As
with Addinsell, one wants to hear more of this neglected composer.
Benjamin Frankel's main title to The Man in the White Suit,
which opens the album, manages to convey both hilarity and alarm in
its brief compass, in much the same way Herrmann did in scores such as
The Devil and Daniel Webster and The Trouble With Harry.
The Ernest Irving romp, Whisky Galore! is representative and,
like the Auric, blessedly lively. Tristam Cary's suite from The
Lady Killers, which gets more space than any other piece, is
craftsman-like, suitably facetious and ultimately forgettable. (Alec
Guinness, like Peter Sellers who shared the screen with him for the
only time here, does not invite involvement from his composers;
Malcolm Arnold let Guinness fend for himself in Bridge on the
River Kwai).
There is much to admire
in the chosen excerpts and so carefully reconstructed for this CD. My
reservations have little to do with inherent defects in performance or
recording. In both aspects, this release is exemplary. Finally,
though, I am left to muse upon the mysterious art of touching the
heart. This CD doesn't alter my impression that my fellow Brits, by
constitution or by choice, find this gift more elusive than their
Hollywood cousins. |