I expected what I got
with this CD. And somewhat less than that. Williams displays his usual
expertise with effects and orchestration. We've grown to expect that.
We've also come to expect one or two memorable (if mechanical) themes,
and we get those. But the difference between this score and the three
previous Lucas/Skywalker scores may be that Williams, like Lucas, no
longer believes in his own mythology. Menace is a peculiarly
enervated musical workout, as if Williams can no longer (he's 67 this
year) get very enthused with cartoon - and now computer-generated -
characters. One senses from the critical reaction to the film (I
haven't seen it) that Lucas, too, is tired out by too long in the
phantasmagorical outback.
I liked Star Wars,
The Empire Strikes Back somewhat less, and Return of the
Jedi less still. As the Lucas Empire grew in proportion to their
success, and the technological marvels increasingly took over, the
pleasure of myth recognition diminished exponentially in the opposite
direction. The original tale was confessed high-tech soup with
eclectic ingredients, from Alexander Nevsky and The Thief
of Baghdad to Laurel and Hardy and Disney. We seemed to respond
subliminally to the barely disguised borrowings from both Hollywood
and ancient mythologies. The technique was subservient to the
taletelling. As the series progressed, the percentage of original
material increased, with the concomitant technology outpacing Lucas'
imagination. And so it was with Williams' music. The score for Star
Wars was an eclectic meld, like the movie itself. The dramatic
thrust and mystery of Holst's Planets with a heavy overlay of
Rozsa and especially Korngold. Now let it be admitted that we owe much
of the resurgence of the traditional Hollywood film score to Star
Wars' phenomenal sales. But Williams seems to have been trapped in
a symphonic straight jacket he himself designed. As a musician who
started out in the orchestral jazz tradition of Previn, North and
Bernstein (both Leonard and Elmer), and as Johnny Williams, he
became John, and curtailed his options along with his name.
Along the way, he inherited (by default) Korngold's vacant throne. The
problem is that while Williams is enough of a pro to manufacture a
traditional, echt-Hollywood sound, I don't sense that he feels
the emotions that inspired and infused the orchestral sweep of
Korngold, Steiner, Rozsa and Newman. Again, Williams is a keyboard
player by training (he was the piano soloist in Newman's Fox orchestra
forty years ago). The great romantic gestures, the arching
Tchaikovskian string theme, do not seem to come naturally to him. One
cannot but envy his abilities as orchestrator and conductor, but his
themes, to these ears, always leave an impression of ersatz emotion,
factory-Max and neo-Newman. There's often much to admire, but nothing
to love.
Phantom Menace,
however, is surprisingly bereft of that which grabbed us in his score
for Star Wars - massive orchestral effects and romantic excess
in the best Richard Strauss style (Williams even managed to write an
affecting love theme for that least affecting of romantic heroines,
Carrie Fisher). Aware of the absence of the former panache, some have
praised Williams for a new subtlety. But do we want subtlety in a film
titled The Phantom Menace? No, I suspect Williams is just a
mite tired of the whole assembly-line aspect of the Lucas phenomenon
but can't find a graceful way to turn down either George or the
financial boon attached to it (how many redundant recordings of the
first three Star Wars scores has he now done?).
For those readers who
are not film music buffs, we might note that Orff's Carmina Burana
has become to this generation what Rachmaninov was to the "Golden
Age". That is, the well from which almost every film composer
draws - therefore instant cliché. Williams has appropriated
Carmina for his Duel of the Fates in the new score.
Orff had one good idea, but sub-Orff (I resisted the more natural
phrase, "fake Orff", just in case someone decides to read
this paragraph out loud) - sub-Orff, I say, is decidedly less
delicious than pseudo-Rachmaninov. |