Monitor Audio Platinum PL200 Loudspeakers

by Audiophilia on June 23, 2013 · 18 comments

in Loudspeakers, Star Components

by Karl Sigman

Speakers are, as my closest audiophile friends and colleagues always remind me, the most important component of any high-end audio system. But unlike, say, an interconnect cable or a DAC, or even an amplifier, speakers are not easy to slip into a New York City apartment unnoticed. More importantly, they usually come with certain serious constraints attached to them by others who live with you, such as one’s wife. Speakers are viewed like furniture: a curio cabinet, a dinner table or even a couch — they are not supposed to be (or allowed to be) visually intrusive in the general ambiance of your home. Navigating this fact to optimize the sound of your system is an art and the constraints imposed can vary widely from home to home. I am fortunate to have a wife who does not impose a strict ‘heard but not seen’ condition, but instead imposes only two required conditions — all reasonable — before allowing me to bring speakers into our apartment:

C1: They must look like elegant furniture that match and complement our apartment as a whole. (Only two units that is; please no cluttering separate subwoofers or centre - channel.)

C2: Each speaker may be neither taller nor heavier than she.

Although I admit trying to take advantage of C2 once when my wife was pregnant (to no avail), these conditions have overall worked out splendidly. Plenty of modern three-way floorstanding speakers satisfy the conditions imposed, and thus smaller monitor-style speakers on a stand or desk or wall-mounted are not a required option for me. My B&W 804 Diamond speakers in Rosenut sailed through C1/C2 with flying colors and even the unique outer-space looking shiny black tweeter gracefully placed atop each is viewed as a piece of art by all who enter our abode.

I now felt, however, that the time had come to work seriously on upgrading my speakers to improve the sound quality — and on my own terms. I had heard several systems over the last year with speakers endowed with a wider frequency range and improvement in sound quality that sometimes totally staggered me, and this even included some downright extraordinary sounding monitor-style speakers. By better sound quality I mean better attack and decay for percussion, with its lingering lifelike after effects, more detail and depth at all frequencies, more transparency, better timbral accuracy, faster, and more/extended/tight bass. Price, however, is an additional constraint and it can be non-trivial; even audiophile quality monitor-style speakers can cost retail upwards of $30K a pair. I wanted to keep within the general price range (±$3k USA, loosely) of the B&W 804 Diamonds which are $7,500 USA retail per pair.

A family friend since the ’70s, Nick Perfito, owner of the oldest (and most excellent) high-end stereo shop in Connecticut, The Stereo Shop, after meeting my lively toddler daughter before I acquired the B&W 804 Diamonds warned me: ‘If you have young children, then it is highly likely that they will poke a hole in your Diamond tweeters, thus requiring you to replace them at a very high cost,’ and he had ample (hilarious) real-life stories on hand to make his point. Fortunately, this did not happen to me; but that might be because my daughter was not tall enough yet!

As a final practical matter, I also demanded simplicity — I wanted to use the same supporting equipment that I already was using; my two monoblock amps (one for each speaker), speaker cables, and so on. I wanted a simple speaker swap for the desired significant improvement in sound. Since I do not use a preamplifier (I only use digital audio files on a computer as server connected to a DAC connected directly into my amps), I particularly wanted new speakers with exceptional transparency. So, I started digging around. While doing so I recalled a classic quote from Oscar Wilde: ‘I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.’

But given all the constraints and desires mentioned above — the budget constraint in particular — my quest appeared to be a daunting one.

To The Rescue: Monitor Audio Ltd from the UK, founded in 1972.

Finally, after floundering about at the recent NY Audio Show 2013 hunting for speaker options, and flirting for a while with several well-known and respected speaker companies (KEF, for example), onto my radar screen entered Monitor Audio Ltd. The company’s speakers appeared to contain unusual and inventive engineering, offer lifelike, natural sound, be of solid construction, and all of this with a very attractive price tag at various levels. I became intensely interested.

In addition to an entry-level MR Series, Monitor Audio offers four series of speakers (in increasing quality and price): Bronze BX, Silver RX, Gold GX and their flagship Platinum (PL) series that includes three models: the PL100 bookshelf and the PL200 and PL300 floorstanders. The PL100 is a two-way model while the latter two are three-way models.

The Gold and Platinum series contain special proprietary ribbon tweeters, with the Platinum series culminating with the reference PL300 model that has an astonishing frequency response of 28Hz to 100kHz, while retailing for only $11,000 USA per pair. High-end speakers typically have an upper frequency response above 20kHz (the upper limit of human hearing); the 804 Diamonds, for example, are up at 28kHz. Other companies offer speaker models in the 30-35kHz region and the KEF Reference models are even up at 65kHz, but 100kHz is extremely unusual. In Monitor Audio’s own words, ‘Specified to reach ultra-high frequencies up to an elusive 100 kHz, the Platinum’s magical ribbon tweeter will reproduce with ease every last nuance and detail from vinyl, CD, DVD-A and SACD, together with the wider bandwidth of HD-DVD and Blu-ray.’ As we shall see, they mean it, and they should add/update, ‘every last nuance and detail from digital audio files.’

Unfortunately, the PL300 speakers are hefty, weighing in at nearly 100 pounds each — condition C2 is being tested! More to the point, they are meant for a considerably larger listening space than I have (mine being 12’ x 15’). To set them up properly, I would have to place one in the living room and the other in the kitchen — seriously compromising condition C1 to say the least. And, at full throttle, I was warned, they would probably knock my windows out and get me evicted. The PL300 would be overkill. As such, I became absolutely riveted to the smaller and lighter PL200 model, their newest addition of the three. So I went to go see them to check them out.

Not only does the PL200 have the same famous high-frequency C-CAM ribbon tweeter and the same 4” midrange driver as the PL300, but its two 6.5” bass drivers are cleverly scaled down versions of the PL300’s larger 8” ones. But, here is the truly amazing part: each PL200 speaker only takes up about 33% of the volume of the PL300, weighs about 25% less (73 pounds), is only 39” tall, and has nearly the same performance specs — condition C2 is certainly met. Moreover, the retail price per pair is only $9,000, falling safely into my proclaimed budget range. I am leaving out the very impressive complex details of the proprietary designing and ingenuity of Monitor Audio that went into this major accomplishment — an engineering feat extraordinaire.

Rear port.

Rear port.

How Do PL200 Speakers Look?

Although more masculine in appearance than my B&Ws, the PL200 speakers are refined and elegant looking, gorgeous in fact — condition C1 is easily met. The real wood Veneer finish options (there are two, Santos Rosewood and Ebony, as well as a separate, Piano Black option) are carefully lacquered and stunningly beautiful. When the front black metal grille is removed, luxurious black leather encompassing the drivers is revealed, of the sort normally found as upholstery in the finest automobiles. Even when the protective grilles are attached, they expose the drivers — you can still see all four of them. Brilliant. A decision was made: I would make a serious effort to acquire a new pair of the PL200 speakers for review. I succeeded; I chose the Santos Rosewood Real Wood Veneer finish.

Setting Up The PL200s

It took only 30 minutes with the help of one of my brothers to set up the PL200 speakers and connect them to my system. The heavy-duty cardboard boxes they come in are themselves remarkable; velcro is used to seal them instead of staples, for example. We took each out of the box, and attached four screw-in spikes onto the bottom of the already attached black base, and then stood them on my living room rug exactly where the B&W 804s had been. Then we magnetically attached the black metal front grilles (optional to use), attached the speaker cables (already connected to my amplifiers on the other end) and then turned the system on— voila! The base (plinth) keeps them very stable; there is no way a child can knock them over. Super. If you want the speakers on a bare floor instead of a rug you just use the four soft-padded feet without the spikes and then you can properly level them by using the tiny leveling device in the tool kit provided. Thoughtful. Because of the ribbon tweeter, I was advised to toe-in direct to my ears, which I did and it was easily established as optimal with simple and quick experimentation even before I started seriously testing/reviewing. Widening out the toe-in caused the soundstage to become huge and unfocused, for example.

PL200 rear panel jumpers and adjustable stands.

PL200 rear panel jumpers and adjustable stands.

Special thanks to Sheldon Ginn (V.P. of Sales and Marketing in North America for Kevro Int. Inc., the North American distributor for Monitor Audio, based in Ontario Canada) and Michael Naidu (System Designer and Authorized Monitor Audio Dealer at The Sound Exchange in Somerville, New Jersey), for their help, patience and assistance with my queries, requests and acquisition. Michael allowed me extensive listening to his on-site showcase pair of PL200 speakers and was very generous with his knowledge both before and after I acquired a pair to take home. (And, his shop has one of the largest music collections to use for listening/testing that I have ever seen.)

Sound Quality

New speakers always require some time to break in, particularly the woofers, so I knew that I had to be patient and wait before reviewing the PL200s in earnest. I purposely played boring elevator-style music with lots of bass 24 hours a day continuously for 4 days before even beginning my review. When I finally began my testing, I enjoyed what I heard right from the start: In less than a fortnight, the PL200s had transformed my listening space into a mini concert hall. Not only were all of my desired speaker improvements significantly addressed, but there was also an unexpected improvement in imaging, soundstage and dynamics, among other things. Wonderful.

As a first a test, I listened to ‘We Get Requests’, The Oscar Peterson Trio, Polygram Records (1997; remastered) the track ‘You Look Good To Me’. The staging and imaging were phenomenal, the extended bass was deep, tight and eloquent, and as for resolution/detail: About one minute into the recording, I could hear one of the musicians whispering, from the right channel, and saying things like ‘baby.’ Nothing like that came out of my system before. Tremendous.

As a second test, I decided for a piece with voice. Billy Joel’s title song ‘An Innocent Man’ from the album as a 96kHz/24bit FLAC file startled me: Every time he snapped his fingers you could hear it echo across the room, and I had never heard his strong voice with its highs and lows sound so lifelike before, and there was some reverb in the recording of Joel’s voice that I had never heard before either. In 2010 Steven Axelrod, a writer for, wonderfully summarized Joel’s voice as follows: ‘Billy Joel has one of the great rock and roll voices — or perhaps I should say, he has three of the great rock and roll voices — a screamer, a crooner and a straight-ahead band-fronting tenor.’ Through the PL200 speakers I could vividly hear all three singing to me.

I followed up the singing with some of my favorites such as Norah Jones, ‘Come Away With Me’, Jacintha, ‘Autumn Leaves’, and Diana Krall, ‘Love Scenes’. All were absolutely lifelike and natural; just wonderful from the PL200s. I finished with Harry Belafonte’s classic ‘Day O’ from ‘Belafonte at Carnegie Hall’, a live performance, and his rendition of ‘John Henry’ from his ‘All Time Greatest Hits’. The lifelike soundstage (Carnegie Hall!) revealed by the PL200s was exceptional.

I quickly changed gear: If Billy Joel’s snapping fingers can sound like that, I thought, how about percussion in general? I put on the Jacques Loussier Trio’s, ‘The Best of Play Bach’ track 2, ‘Italian Concerto: Allegro’. Every cymbal had its own distinct timbre, and I could tell through the PL200s that the drummer, Andre Arpino, was using sticks with plastic tips. I listened next to the album ‘Fontessa’ by The Modern Jazz Quartet, with Milt Jackson on vibraphone. Spectacular imaging and soundstage with an impeccably natural sound was exposed by the PL200s; I now had a vibraphone in my apartment upon demand. And I didn’t have to sit in the sweet spot of my couch for that effect: I could stroll around my apartment with a glass of iced tea and still hear the vibes loud and clear. Further favorites of mine for drums (Bill Bruford’s live Earthworks album ‘Random Acts of Happiness’, and his ‘Masterstrokes’ album, for example), revealed just amazing timbre and accuracy. At times I could even hear the snare drum vibrate when the tom toms were played.

But, there was more going on here: The piano I was now hearing from the PL200s sounded more full-bodied and rich than I had heard before on my system from piano in general. The piano is, after all, a partly percussive instrument, and it is one of my favorite instruments to listen too. So why, I asked myself, did I not include the sound of a piano in any of my previous reviews? This lead to yet another unplanned detour.

In my recent review of the PS Audio PerfectWave MKII DAC, I was completely captivated by the cello sound on ‘Beethoven’s Complete Works for Piano and Cello’ performed by Zuill Bailey (cello) and Simone Dinnerstein (piano). I never commented at all on the sound of the piano because coming through my (then) speakers it was not special — a somewhat muted sound that was upstaged by the cello. So, I simply ignored it in the MKII review. But now, out of the PL200s, the sound from the piano was full of life. There was a resonating, sustained, and vibrant quality that was lacking before. Every time Dinnerstein hit a key, it was bright and rich-sounding with a longer and beautifully lingering decay. It caught me by surprise. I continued on with Bach’s Partita No. 1 for Keyboard as performed by Piotr Anderszewski on piano. The Menuets 1 and 2 have particular significance to me because I still recall listening to them played by my father on our living room grand piano when I was four years old or so. The PL200s brought Partita No. 1 back to life for me. Bravo.

I finished up my piano listening with Ginastera, Piano Concerto No. 1, Op. 28, the 4th movement, ‘Toccata Concertata’, but it was filled with such fascinating detailed percussive sounds as displayed by the PL200s that I could not help myself: I quickly switched to the classical rock adaptation of it, ‘Toccata’ from Emerson Lake & Palmer (ELP), ‘Brain Salad Surgery’. An extraordinary piece — perhaps the greatest example of classical rock ever — not only are there timpani and tubular bells used, but it even contains the first example of using a drum kit connected to a Moog synthesizer, within a drum solo by Carl Palmer. ELP was deeply criticized at the time (mainly by people who did not even bother to listen to it first) for daring to treat a classical piece of music in that way, but Emerson personally visited Ginastera in Switzerland to play a recording of it for him and Ginastera famously told him (with some funny confusion at first), ‘You have captured the essence of my music, and no one’s ever done that before.’ I had seen ELP perform ‘Toccata’ live in the mid 1970s with a near front-row seat, and, as with the aforementioned Bach Partita, the PL200s brought this experience back to life for me.

Moving on, I decided it was time to give the PL200s a ‘stress’ test — volume. For fun I tried out something unusual. Paul Kaplan (from Kaplan Cable), when visiting my home some time ago to help me properly sort out my power cord situation (I am grateful to him), brought me an odd CD, ‘Nu Made (Remixes)’ by Balkan Beat Box. He had used it at the time to assess my system (in his own mysterious way). I ripped it but forgot about it — until now. Tracks 2 and 3, ‘Digital Monkey’ and ‘Adir Adirim’, for example, are fascinating; although not for everyone, I would describe the music as exotic Israeli-snake-charming-electro-disco-punk music, and it was very powerful and lively sounding from the PL200s. I cranked up the volume very high to give the PL200s a worthy workout and challenge them. Wow! The PL200s could really handle high volume. A final note about track 3: My toddler daughter started dancing about the living room and said, ‘I like this song Papa, it sounds like a horsey.’


The better/more bass the PL200s offer from what I had (and needed) is exemplary — eloquent and extended. I am not a fan of booming ‘house-shaking’ bass: although I greatly enjoy drinking a full-bodied, in-your-face-15%-alcohol Zinfandel from California once in a while, I don’t want every wine I drink to taste like that: I want a bass, a timpani or bass drum to sound like a bass, a timpani or a bass drum — not like a sonic boom. In that regard the PL200s are top-notch.


By digging for gold, I hit platinum with the Monitor Audio PL200 speakers. With such extraordinary performance at $9,000 per pair retail, the PL200s are competitive with speakers that cost much more. And, the PL200s offer an additional unexpected plus: When the volume is low, the sound quality is still outstanding. As I do most of my writing late at night when my children are sleeping, this was a most welcome find. Meanwhile, my wife now wants a new black leather couch to go with the black leather behind the grilles — I have decided it’s worth it as long as I still get my sweet spot. The PL200 get my highest recommendation.

[We are proud to award the Monitor Audio Platinum PL200 Loudspeakers an Audiophilia Star Component Award. Congratulations! - Ed]

Monitor Audio Platinum PL200 Speakers

Manufactured by Monitor Audio Ltd
North American Distributor:
Kevro International, 902 McKay Road, Suite#4, Pickering, Ontario, Canada
L1W 3X8
Tel: (905) 428-2800
Fax: (905) 428-0004


Price: $ 9000 USA
Source: Purchase


Frequency Response: 35 Hz - 100 KHz
Sensitivity (1W@1M): 90 dB
Nominal Impedance: 4 Ohms
Maximum S.P.L
(Per pair in room): 117.8 dBA
Power Handling (RMS): 250 W
Recommended Amplifier Requirements (RMS): 100 - 250 W
Bass Alignment: Rear Ported HiVeII technology
Sealed Mid-range TLE
Mid / H.F Crossover Frequency: 3600 Hz
Bass Low Pass Crossover Frequency: 600 Hz
Drive Unit Complement: 2 x 6.5″ long-throw RDT bass drivers
1 x 4″ RDT mid-range driver
1 x C-CAM high frequency ribbon transducer
External Dimensions - Including Fixed Plinth (H x W x D): 998 x 360 x 375 mm
(39 5/16 x 14 3/16 x 14 3/4 inches)
Weight (each) Including Plinth: 33Kg (72.7 lbs)

Associated Equipment

Computer (as server) with peripherals: Apple Mac Mini (2013 model with 1TB internal Fusion Drive), running Pure Music/iTunes with a monitor, keyboard, mouse and LG BE14NU40 external disk drive for CD ripping, and two Seagate Backup Plus 3TB external drives running in RAID 1. An Apple iPad for remote use.
DAC: PS Audio PerfectWave DAC
Amplifiers: 2 Wyred 4 Sound W4S mAMP Monoblock Amplifiers
Speakers: B&W 804 Diamond
Speaker cables: Acoustic Zen Hologram II, spade with bi-wire (for the speaker end)
Amps to DAC interconnects: Acoustic Zen Absolute (Zero Crystal Silver) XLR
USB cable from Mac Mini to DAC: Wireworld Platinum USB cable
Power cords for amps: Kaplan Cable HE Mk2
Power cord for MKII DAC: Kaplan Cable GS MkII
Power cord for Mac Mini: P.I. Audio Group MPC/Mini++
Power center: PS Audio Dectet with PS Audio AC-10 power cord
Kaplan Cable customized Hubbell wall outlet for the PS Audio Dectet

Associated Music

24-bit FLAC files
Billy Joel, An Innocent Man, 96kHz/24bit
Steely Dan, Gaucho, 96kHz/24bit
James Taylor, Sweet Baby James, 192kHz/24bit
Norah Jones, Come Away With Me, 192kHz/24bit
The Spanish Masters, Isabel Bayrakdarian and Zuill Bailey, 88kHz/24bit
Kim Kashkashian, Kurtag / Ligeti: Music for Viola, 44.1kHz/24bit
Duke Ellington, Concert In The Virgin Islands, 192kHz/24bit
Recomposed by Max Richter - Vivaldi: The Four Seasons, 96kHz/24bit
Billy Cobham, Spectrum, 96kHz/24bit
Beethoven: Symphonies Nos. 5 and 7, Conducted by Carlos Kleiber, Vienna Philhar- monic, 88kHz/24bit
Yes, Roundabout, 96kHz/24bit

CDs (converted to Apple Lossless 16bit/44.1kHz)
Beethoven: Complete Works for Piano and Cello, Zuill Bailey and Simone Dinnerstein, Telarc (2006) (2 CDs)
Jacques Loussier Trio, The Best of Play Bach, Hybrid SACD - DSD, Original recording remastered, Telarc (2004)
Fontessa, The Modern Jazz Quartet, Atlantic (1990)
Bach Partitas 1,3,6, Piotr Anderszewski (piano), Virgin Classics (2002)
We Get Requests, The Oscar Peterson Trio, Polygram Records (1997; remastered)
Diana Krall, Love Scenes, Grp Records (1997)
Harry Belafonte, All Time Greatest Hits Vol. I , RCA (1990)
Belafonte At Carnegie Hall, Original recording remastered, RCA (1989)
Jacintha, Autumn Leaves, The Songs of Johnny Mercer, Groove Note Records (1999)
Fusion India, Passage to India, Navras Record Ltd (2003)
Balkan Beat Box, Nu Made (Remixes), JDub Records (2009)
Miles Davis, Kind of Blue, Columbia (1997 reissue)
Bill Bruford, Master Strokes, EG Records (1986)
Bill Bruford’s Earthworks, Random Acts of Happiness, Summerfold (2005)
Ginastera, Piano Concertos Nos. 1 and 2, Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra, Naxos (2001)
Emerson, Lake & Palmer, Brain Salad Surgery, Shout! Factory (2007 reissue of original 1973 recording)

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

admin 06.11.13 at 1:03 pm

A wonderful, comprehensive review. Thanks, Karl.

Intrigued to hear them!

Cheers, a

Karl Sigman 06.11.13 at 1:33 pm

Thanks Anthony; you are always welcome to come visit and listen!

Mike Stulken 06.11.13 at 5:11 pm

I’ve owned a pair of PL200’s for a year and a half and I can vouch for the attributes you identified in these speakers. I came from a 2 way speaker that didn’t resolve multi-instrument very well. What attracted me to the PL200’s is their coherence and detail retreival. I recently attended a live performance of Beethoven’s 5th Piano Concerto. Just for fun, I went home and listened to a performance of a DSD file (using the excellent Chordette DAC) and was impressed how near to life-like the sound from the PL’s was. My only quibble with them is that the high’s can be a bit bright on occassion and am currently trying to upgrade to an all tube amplifier to tame this. I note that you are using the MAMPs and was wondering how well they fit with the PL’s (I’ve read that the they have a warmish sound)? Given the many multiple’s of $’s one can spend on reference quality speakers, I’m impressed by the value of these (esp as I paid 30% less than list on a demo close out pair).

Karl Sigman 06.12.13 at 2:54 am

Thanks Mike.
I am indeed using the Wyred 4 Sound mAMPs, with the PS Audio PerfectWave DAC, and the fit is really good with the PL; smooth and natural. I have not yet experimented with changing interconnects (DAC to MAMPS) with the PL; but that may offer interesting changes that could help even your brightness.

Sheldon Ginn 06.13.13 at 1:30 pm

Thank you Anthony for the opportunity to have the Platinum 200’s reviewed at Audiophilia. I’d like to also thank Karl for his time with the PL 200’s and the thorough review. I think you have captured the essence of the Platinum series with the beautiful fit n finish, superb resolution, musicality and the speakers ability to reproduce music at low volumes while having the ability to wow with their power, clarity and control capabilities. On top of that, they really do represent value when one tries to replicate the qualities for similar money.

Sheldon Ginn
V.P of Sales and Mktg.

admin 06.13.13 at 2:12 pm

You are most welcome. I’m looking forward to hearing them.

Cheers , Anthony

Karl Sigman 06.13.13 at 3:04 pm

Sheldon, thanks; it was a pleasure reviewing the PL200; they really are special.

PS: Thanks (Monitor Audio) for giving me and others here in NYC ammunition for getting Anthony to visit us again — now to listen to the PL200!

Mick 06.14.13 at 3:59 am

Absolutely stunning looking speakers. $9k although not expensive in the hi-fi world ain’t chump change so they’re a little out of my range and the moment, but they (or the next release) will be on my list for when I can upgrade.

One thing; Norah Jones, Dianna Krall, Jacintha. Really? Yawn.
A good music reproduction system is good because it reproduces MUSIC. It’s purposes is not to play music that showcases it’s ability to produce accurate sound. Audionerds, really.

admin 06.14.13 at 10:29 am

One thing. Rather than casting aspersions at the reviewer’s musical taste (a reviewer has to listen to lots of music that is not to personal taste), why don’t you give us your way of evaluating a new speaker?

Lowercase will be fine. Thx.

Mick 06.14.13 at 10:42 pm

I’d much rather cast aspersions on the musical taste as the evaluation method seems sound. To me, and to many others, too much of the audio ‘press’ constantly refer to the same dull source material. Then they’ll wax lyrical about how they can try and get younger people involved in their ‘hobby’.

If the recent boom in head-fi proves anything it’s that string quartets and sleepy breathy vocalists isn’t all that people want to listen to.

I’m not suggesting you stick on the Black Eyed Peas latest release (after all, rubbish in = rubbish out) but there has to be something more relevant to the mass market. A happy medium perhaps?

admin 06.15.13 at 7:33 am

I’m sure you would. It’s much easier than answering my question.

And, while I agree that the listening range of many audiophiles is astonishingly narrow, your silly comment about string quartets is just as myopic.

Back to Mr. Sigman’s speaker review…

Martin Sinton 06.15.13 at 11:28 am

Totally agree with your comprehensive review on the PL200’s.

Had the MA GS20’s before these which i’ve had about 12 months, they give a similar tonal character but just a whole lot more of everything, with a deeper and wider soundstage.
There bi-amped with Cyrus electronics which are renowned for digging up every last detail and nuance. Some people would say it could be a little to much but IMHO if its on the recording its meant to be heard. The tonal balance is biased towards the top end but that’s not to say the bass is lacking in any way. Its not thunderous but is extremely tuneful and defined, just as would expect to hear at a live venue.
Anyway great review, glad you like em….

Karl Sigman 06.15.13 at 11:50 am

Many thanks Martin, it is nice to know others appreciate these speakers as much as I do!

Bobby Kingma 06.18.13 at 4:52 pm

I owned the Pl-300 for about 5 years. These days I play with the Pl-200 and PLW-15 for stereo. I also use the PLC-150 and GXFX for surround. I use the Pass Labs X250.5 for stereo. I think I will go later tot the X600.5. I sold amny many Platinum speakers. This year I was at a big audio show with my own set. Many including the head of the biggest audio magzine in Holland said that I was the absolute sound of the whole show. The Pl-200 is superior in speed, timing, focus and depth compared to the Pl-300. With the PLW-15 it blow’s away the Pl-300 by ease. Monitor Audio admit the filter is so much better than the filter of the Pl-300. Before the Pl-300 I owned the B&W 800 S of 125 kg each. I could not hear classical music by the Pl-300. I did not like the sound. With the Pl-200 it changed. Now I love classical musis again. The Platinum series use superior cross over filter compared to brands like B&W, Kef, Dynaudio and many other brands. I stopped with B&W after 8 years of Nautilus 802 and 800 S. B&W is poor in crossover filters. There is almost no depth. At the end I really hated it. For the absolute sound depth is a pre. So I had to move on and siad goodbye to B&W. Now I play at 4-5 metres behind and even 1 mmetre beside the speakers. The stage is stunning. I love the Pl-200!!

admin 06.18.13 at 6:12 pm

Thanks for the comprehensive comment, Bobby.

Cheers, a

Paul Kaplan 06.19.13 at 3:34 pm

“One thing; Norah Jones, Dianna Krall, Jacintha. Really? Yawn.
A good music reproduction system is good because it reproduces MUSIC. It’s purposes is not to play music that showcases it’s ability to produce accurate sound. Audionerds, really.”
‘I’m not suggesting you stick on the Black Eyed Peas latest release (after all, rubbish in = rubbish out) but there has to be something more relevant to the mass market. A happy medium perhaps?”

Didn’t Karl specifically state that he played Balkan Beat Box ‘Nu-Med Remix’?
Before casting aspersions, dance a mile in his ears…..
Iff’n the speakers can handle BBB, it can handle, with aplomb, most anything you could throw at it….

Mike Stulken 06.20.13 at 5:48 pm

Mick, you need to be careful making obtuse comments in public. Your generalizations lack insight into individual tastes and experience. My tastes run into classical music, but from time to time I enjoy 80’s bands like the Jesus and Mary Chain or the Dead Kennedy’s. Would a fine speaker like the PL200 highlight musical details in this genre? Probably not. Reviewers look for music that shows off complex musical details and how well a piece of equipment resolves these. In my case, if I listened only to 80’s punk themed music, I could get as much musical satisfaction from a boombox. Since my tastes have evolved into more complex music, especially string quartets, I looked for a speaker that would resolve multi-instrument and allow me to hear each “voice”.

Richard 05.17.14 at 4:44 am

Love your review. I owe these myself too.
Since these speakers are so chirurgical precise (no mercy: shit in is shit out) i would suggest 2 easy upgrades which - well at least for me - make a significant difference in audio quality.
1 - i read you use Apple lossless.
i would bet if u transfer them to aiff you will hear a difference. It seems that itunes ‘unzip’ then on the fly and somehow it sounds more dull, less detailed.
2 - ‘pure music’ player
This a very user-friendly player and gives better sound then itunes. However, if u try Amarra instead, it will be hard for me to believe u wouldn’t conceive it an upgrade: more lifelike. Geek notation: i prefer the 2.5.1 version better then the current 6.0 player.
These 2 small upgrades together are in my book be so essential, that they make the investment in these Expensive speakers pay off. Not sure i would recomment these speakers to a friend if they wouldn’t bother about these.

Anyway, maybe the tips can help u enjoy these speakers even more :)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>